Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) Clearinghouse acf home privacy policy
spacer_line

Maryland's REACH Program Evaluation Summary

Abstract
Southern Maryland Tri-County Community Action Committee, Inc. (SMTCCAC) a private, non-profit service provider with experience in administering the LIHEAP and DOE Weatherization Programs, operated the REACH program. The partnership formed for this effort includes Southern Maryland Energy Coop (SMECO), a local utility provider, other community service providers and existing resources of the SMTCCAC.

The program offered a comprehensive approach to irregular energy payments and energy use reduction to enable participants to attain energy self-sufficiency.

Grant Amount
$169,178 - FY 1996 funding

Duration
Two years

Goals
The REACH program goals attempted to help clients:

  • Reduce their electric bill
  • Improve their budgeting skills
  • Improve their educational and/or occupational opportunities

Client Eligibility Criteria
The participants in the program represent the most vulnerable in the area and are LIHEAP recipients with high-energy use.

Client Services
Services and benefits included the following: home walkthroughs, household action plan workshops, follow-up contacts with the REACH caseworkers, financial assistance, low-cost weatherization measures, referrals to other services, money management and budget counseling, and a monthly newsletter.

Outcomes
According to the evaluation completed by the Loyola College Center for Social and Community Research evaluation team, the REACH program achieved several of its goals. Clients received nearly $60,000 of financial assistance to help with the costs of living relating to energy use and rent or mortgage expenses. Three hundred sixty three referrals were made to agencies that provide assistance in weatherization, educational training, and job placement. Results further indicate that program participants were able to reduce or stabilize their energy usage and they received fewer termination notices than members of a control group did. According to the evaluation, "Seven clients achieved self sufficiency while enrolled in the program."

The program goals not met include the following: 1) because of the difficulty in recruiting and contacting clients, over half of those recruited were dropped. This contact problem also interfered with caseworkers' ability to meet regularly with clients and to obtain proper information for the program's evaluation. 2) The newsletter and workshops were discontinued due to lack of interest by clients. 3) Significant increases in electric bill payments were not evidenced as had been expected.

Since its implementation, the REACH program has recruited 148 clients. For the reasons mentioned above, 92 clients have been eliminated from the program over its two-year operation. As a result, the current REACH caseload includes 56 clients. In the exit surveys, 97 percent responded positively that the REACH program as a whole was worthwhile.
 
Contact: Ralph Markus
Maryland Community Services Administration
Energy Assistance Program
(410) 767-7415
rmarkus@dhr.state.md.us


Page Last Updated: December 7, 2005