Nebraska's REACH I Program Evaluation Summary
Abstract
The Nebraska Department of Social Services (DSS), a LIHEAP service
provider, and Lincoln Action Program (LAP), a community action agency
in Lincoln, Nebraska, endeavored to demonstrate the effectiveness
of using behavioral change to reduce the energy burden of low-income
households. LAP, which has successfully delivered the Weatherization
Assistance Program for more than 20 years, implemented Nebraska's
REACH I Project. The project was to target 600 low-income households
living within Lincoln's designated Enterprise Community for
two years. It was anticipated that 200 participants would drop out,
and these clients would serve as the control group
The project tested three groups:
- Multiple-need, low-income households
requesting help with their utility bills, who agree to attend
a series of energy efficiency education and budgeting workshops
sponsored by LAP, receive energy self-sufficiency services, and
long-term, intensive case management to receive payment of their
utility bill(s);
- Low-income households requesting
help with their utility bills, who agree to attend a series of
energy efficiency education and budgeting workshops, receive energy
self-sufficiency services, and short-term case management to receive
payment of their utility bill(s); and,
- Low-income households requesting
help with their utility bills, who either refuse or fail to attend
the workshops, receive energy self-sufficiency services and case
management, will serve as the control group.
The project tested the hypothesis that:
Low-income households, who request
help with their utility bills, that attend energy efficiency education
and budgeting workshops, receive energy self-sufficiency services,
and case management, will reduce their energy usage and make better
use of their income as compared to a control group not receiving
such services.
Grant Amount
$600,000, of which $100,000 was used for energy efficiency education,
FY 1996 funds.
Duration
Three years, of which nine months were used for project planning
and three months were used for the final evaluation.
Goal
The program's overall goal was to increase the economic self-sufficiency
of participating families through increased energy efficiency in
the home. Due to the targeted population's substandard housing
stock and renter status, the REACH I program focused on changing behaviors
of participating clients to increase energy efficiency, rather than
on upgrading the physical structures they lived in.
Client Eligibility Criteria
The clients were eligible to participate in the program if they
met the following criteria: the clients be at or below 100 percent
of USDA-established poverty level for family size, have lived at
their current residence for at least 12 months, were not expecting
to move from their residence in the immediate future, and needed
assistance with utility bills
Client Services
The services included four linked interventions, as follows: 1)
an in-home energy audit by an energy management specialist; 2) workshop
instruction in five areas related to energy efficiency and finances;
3) on-going case management individually tailored based on the results
of the energy audit and the LAP family assessment, and 4) basic
home weatherization supplies for participant installation.
REACH I provided both the participant
and non-participant groups incentives to take part in the program.
Program participants received $200 to $350 vouchers to pay toward
utility bills and 200 bonus points, which were redeemable at the
LAP Clothing and Goods Bank. Non-participants received a $50 voucher
for utility bills and bonus points at the LAP Clothing and Goods
Bank for reporting utility usage. The incentives were paid to participants
upon completion of all program elements. Non-participants received
their incentives after screening and providing the program with
written permission to obtain energy use data from their utilities.
Outcomes
The Princeton Scorekeeping Method SoftwareŽ (PRISM) was used to
test the main hypotheses. Prism uses a year's monthly utility
data from a residence to produce a weather-adjusted index of energy
use. The difference between pre and post usage equals the savings.
The comparison of pre and post usage to the non-participant group
provides the evaluator with pre to post differences in usage among
the participants and pre to post differences between participant
and non-participant groups.
To test knowledge gained and retained
from the workshops, pre and post tests were given to participants;
another six-month follow-up test was also given to assess their
retention.
The program outcomes are the following:
- participants spent less of their
income on natural gas and electricity than a randomly assigned
group of non-participants;
- participants reduced natural gas
use after program entry while no significant decrease in electricity
use was found;
- participants increased their knowledge
in three areas related to economic self sufficiency (Energy Efficient
Practices, Home Weatherization, and Budgeting and Personal Finance);
- participants retained knowledge
in these areas six months after completing the program.
Over its three-year period, the REACH
I program served 439 clients. Another 202 families received energy
assistance vouchers and bonus points for their participation in
the non-participants control group.
Contact: Brian Mathers
Lincoln Action Program
(402) 471-4515
bmathers@lincoln-action.org
Page Last Updated: March 8, 2007
